THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT A. EKELAND and RANDAL M. HILL
____________
Appeal No. 96-1787
Application No. 08/372,4821
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CAROFF, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 4-6, 8-10, 12, 14-15 and 17, all the claims
pending in the involved application.
The claims on appeal are directed to methods and
associated compositions which involve entrapping a water-
1Application for patent filed January 13, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007