Ex parte EKELAND et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-1787                                                           
          Application No. 08/372,482                                                   


          soluble or water-insoluble substance in a vesicle formed from                
          a particular surface active siloxane.                                        
               Appellants acknowledge on page 3 of their Brief that the                
          pending claims stand or fall together.  Accordingly, we will                 
          limit our consideration to illustrative claim 1 which reads as               
          follows:                                                                     
               1.  A method of entrapping a water-soluble substance in a               
          vesicle formed from a surface active siloxane comprising                     
          forming a mixture by dissolving the water-soluble substance to               
          be entrapped in water, adding a surface active siloxane, and                 
          agitating the mixture, the surface active siloxane consisting                
          essentially of tetravalent SiO  units and monovalent R SiO2                       3  1/2                
          and R’R SiO  units, the ratio of monovalent units to                         
                 2   1/2                                                               
          tetravalent units being from 0.4/1 to 2/1, and from 40 to 90%                
          of all monovalent units being R’R SiO  units, wherein R                      
                                            2  1/2                                     
          denotes a monovalent hydrocarbon group having up to 8 carbon                 
          atoms, and R’ denotes a polyoxyalkylene group terminated by a                
          hydroxyl group, an alkyl group, an aryl group, or an acyl                    
          group.                                                                       
               The examiner relies upon the following prior art                        
          references as evidence of obviousness:                                       
          Kanner et al. (Kanner)   3,887,601                 Jun.  3, 1975             
          Hill et al. (Hill)       5,364,633                 Nov. 15, 1994             
          Hill et al. (Hill)       5,411,744                 May   2, 1995             
               All of the appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               






                                           2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007