THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte EIJI OKAMURA
Appeal No. 96-1895
Application 08/011,6821
HEARD: May 7, 1999
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed February 1, 1993,1
entitled "Positioning Control System," which claims the
foreign filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of
Japanese Application 4-016774, filed January 31, 1992.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007