Paper No. 65
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte PAUL C. HECKEL
and CHARLES H. CLANTON1
______________
Appeal No. 96-1928
Application 07/504,6792
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1In accordance with the examiner's footnote at the bottom of the first
page of the Examiner's Answer dated April 28, 1995, the inventorship of this
reissue application has been changed.
2Application for patent filed April 4, 1990, for Reissue of Patent No.
4,736,308, granted April 5, 1988; based on Application 06/754,512, filed July
10, 1985, which, according to appellants, is a continuation-in-part of
Application 06/647,649, filed September 6, 1984, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007