Appeal No. 96-1928
Application 07/504,679
claims the examiner adds to this basic combination of
references LisaList:
claims 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 26, 33, 43, 54, 55, 71, 72, 76, 79, 80,
82, 83, 85-91, 100, 101, 106-110, 114-117, 123-127, 128-140,
144, 145, 147-158. These rejections are set forth at page 3
of the initial examiner's answer dated April 28, 1995. As to
the second rejection, the examiner does not explicitly include
here a rejection of claim 122, although it is expressed at
page 7 of answer. The bottom of page 10 of this answer
reveals the examiner's intent to reject claims 79-91 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 including claims 84, 87, 88, 89 and 90, although
it is not clear under which rejection of the stated rejections
the examiner intends to reject these latter claims. In any
event, based upon our decision, this question is moot.
Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and
the examiner, reference is made to the briefs and the answers
for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
Generally for the reasons expressed by appellants in the
initial portions of the brief and reply brief dealing with the
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007