Appeal No. 96-1928
Application 07/504,679
approach is not sufficient within 35 U.S.C. § 103. However,
we
remain unconvinced from the collective teachings and
suggestions of Heckel and Vincent as well as the examiner's
reasoning that
it would have been obvious within 35 U.S.C. § 103 to have so
modified Vincent's teachings and suggestions in light of
Heckel.
We do not agree with the examiner's basic view that the
artisan would have reasonably, prospectively viewed the
combination of teachings and suggestions of Vincent and Heckel
in such a manner as to render obvious the subject matter of
the claims stated in the initial rejection on appeal. In a
similar manner, we remain unconvinced of the obviousness of
combining the additional teachings of LisaList to these two
references to reject the claims identified by the examiner in
the second rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007