Appeal No. 96-2025
Application 07/860,254
brief that Inada does not teach the claimed symmetrical
voltage because Inada teaches in Figure 4 that the waveform
X2-Y1 has a voltage in the N frame that is not symmetrical to
the voltage in the P frame.
Appellants reemphasize the point in all of the reply
briefs. In particular, Appellants argue on page 4 of the June
19, 1995 reply brief that Figure 6 (3) illustrates a negative
voltage being applied to a picture element and a positive
voltage being applied to the same picture element. Appellants
further argue
that if the first pulse in Figure 6 (3), namely the negative
voltage pulse, is reoriented to a positive pulse, the first
pulse is identical to the second pulse shown in Figure 6 (3).
Accordingly, Appellants submit that the waveform applied to
the picture element in independent claims 1 through 9 is
symmetrical, because a value represented by a binary coded
signal is applied first to the picture element, and then the
binary complement of the binary code signal is applied to the
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007