Paper No. 35
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte TOMOSHI HIRAYAMA
______________
Appeal No. 1996-2046
Application 07/978,4501
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 2-9, 12, 13 and 15,
Application for patent filed November 18, 1992. According to1
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application 07/642,994,
filed January 18, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007