THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 28 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte INBAE YOON _____________ Appeal No. 96-2081 Application 08/125,8921 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before COHEN, CRAWFORD, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 24 through 30. These claims constitute Application for patent filed September 24, 1993. According to1 appellant, this application is a continuation of application serial no. 07/789,599, filed November 8, 1991, now abandoned, which is a divisional of application serial no. 07/556,081, filed July 24, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,074,840, issued December 24, 1991. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007