Appeal No. 96-2081 Application 08/125,892 for a method of performing an endoscopic operative procedure. Thus, we agree with appellant that each and every claim is limited specifically and unequivocally to a particular combination of steps to be performed during or in the course of an endoscopic-ally performed operative procedure. The patent to Lee discloses a "surgical dressing packer" useful "for packing antiseptic gauze or other surgical dressing into the uterus or deep-seated abscesses or wounds" (lines 9-13). There is no mention in Lee of any endoscopically performed operative procedure much less any teaching or suggestion that the disclosed apparatus would be useful in performing endoscopic surgery. In applying the test for obviousness, we reach the3 conclusion that the claimed method would not have been suggested by the applied prior art. Specifically, we see no suggestion in the applied prior art of using the apparatus disclosed therein in an endoscopically performed operative 3The test for obviousness is what the combined teachings of the references would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art. See In re Young, 927 F.2d 588, 591, 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991) and In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425, 208 USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981). 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007