Appeal No. 96-2160 Application 07/862,888 periodically selecting a task holding a highest execution priority from among said selected tasks in the ready-to-run queue; determining if a task is executing on the processor; if a task is executing on the processor, comparing the execution priority of the selected task to the execution priority of the executing task; responsive to the selected task holding a higher execution priority or to absence of an executing task, processing the selected task for execution on the processor along said first expedited scheduling path; and processing the selected task for execution on the processor along said second scheduling path responsive to the presence of an executing task holding an execution priority higher than the selected task. The examiner relies on the following reference: Deitel, An Introduction to Operating Systems, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., pages 784-823, copyright 1990. Claims 1-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Deitel. Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007