THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 40 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GORDON W. CULP ____________ Appeal No. 96-2162 Application No. 08/265,5611 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1Application for patent filed June 24, 1994. According to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 07/414,176 filed September 28, 1989, now abandoned; which is a division of Application No. 07/252,197 filed September 30, 1988, now U.S. Patent No. 4,928,030 issued May 22, 1990.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007