THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KAZUYUKI FUKUI, YOSHINOBU HADA, TAKANOBU YAMADA, and HIROYUKI IDEYAMA ____________ Appeal No. 96-2281 Application No. 08/061,2251 ____________ HEARD: June 8, 1999 ____________ Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 9, which are all of the claims pending in this application. 1Application for patent filed May 17, 1993.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007