Ex parte FUKUI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-2281                                                          
          Application No. 08/061,225                                                  


               The appellants' invention relates to an image forming                  
          apparatus and method in which masking coefficients are                      
          determined                                                                  
          according to the gradation curve that has been selected.                    
          Claim 7 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads              
          as follows:                                                                 
               7.  A digital color image forming apparatus comprising:                
                    a manual input panel for manually inputting a                     
          desired gradation curve;                                                    
                    a masking processor which multiplies an image signal              
          with a masking coefficient determined according to the                      
          gradation curve inputted with said manual input panel to send               
          the image signal for a print color;                                         
                    a conversion circuit which converts the image signal              
          to print data in correspondence with light quantity data                    
          according to the gradation curve inputted by said manual input              
          panel; and                                                                  
                    a printer which prints the image by exposing a                    
          photoconductor based on said print data.                                    
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Asada          5,018,008                May  21, 1991                       
          Hirota         5,345,320                Sep. 06, 1994                       
                                        (filed Nov. 26, 1991)                         
               Claims 1 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over Asada and Hirota.                                
               Reference is made to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 10,                
          mailed November 17, 1994) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper No.              
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007