Appeal No. 96-2341 Application 08/389,554 which has undissolved inorganic salt such that the composition is suitable for its intended purpose of scouring, and which is still shear thinnable. As stated above, the examiner argues that one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to dilute Munro’s composition to obtain greater coverage or less abrasion, and would have known that a dilution would be reached at which the composition is no longer shear thinnable. The examiner, however, has provided no evidence or reasoning as to why Munro would have motivated one of ordinary skill in the art to use a water concentration as high as about 15 wt% to about 70 wt% as required by appellants’ claims, and would have provided such a person with a reasonable expectation that a composition containing that amount of water would be shear thinnable. See In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488, 493, 20 USPQ2d 1438, 1442 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re O’Farrell, 853 F.2d 894, 902, 7 USPQ2d 1673, 1680 (Fed. Cir. 1988); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 892-93, 225 USPQ 645, 648 (Fed. Cir. 1985). On this record, the guidance for use of such a water concentration comes solely from the description 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007