Ex parte MASUI et al. - Page 3




         Appeal No. 1996-2638                                                      
         Application No. 08/173,930                                                



              placing the skin material on the lower mold and fixing               
         the edge part of the skin material with at least one pin on               
         the inner surface of the lower mold,                                      
              supplying a mass of resin melt between the skin material             
         and the lower mold, and                                                   
              closing the upper and lower molds so that said edge part             
         of the skin material which is fixed by the at least one pin is            
         placed in said groove formed on the surface of the                        
         thermoplastic resin body to thereby form the multilayer molded            
         article having one part covered by the skin material and                  
         another part free of coverage by the skin material.                       
         8. The process according to claim 1, wherein the protrusion               
         is formed in a groove which is formed in the lower mold.                  
         10.  The process according to claim 8, wherein the protrusion             
         is movable in a direction in which the upper and lower molds              
         are closed.                                                               
              As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies on the               
         following prior art2:                                                     
         Masui et al. (Masui ‘179)     5,053,179          Oct. 1, 1991             
                                                (filed Nov. 29, 1988)              


              2 Appellants have not challenged the prior art status of             
         the references relied upon by the examiner.  Note also that               
         appellants are not entitled to the benefit of the filing date             
         of a foreign priority application under 35 U.S.C. § 119 and 37            
         CFR                                                                       
         § 1.55 (a) (1993).  Appellants have not perfected their claim             
         of a foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 by failing to file            
         a sworn or certified English translation corresponding to the             
         foreign priority application, i.e., Japanese Patent                       
         Application 334089/1988.  See 37 CFR § 1.55 (a) (1993).                   
                                        3                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007