Appeal No. 96-2820
Application 08/227,705
view of any of Hannai or Miyabayashi or Schutz or Matsui, as
applied to claims 81, 83, 84, 86, 87 and 89, and further in
view of Sakui. Rather than reiterate the arguments of
Appellants and the Examiner, reference is made to the brief
and answer for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
After a careful review of the evidence before us we
will not sustain the rejection of claims 81 through 90 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 or 35 U.S.C. § 112.
Under the 35 U.S.C. § 112 rejection, the Examiner
states that there is no support or inadequate support in the
specification for the sense amplifiers (with pairs of inputs
and outputs), addressing means, a commutator, dual port
input's, arithmetic logic units (ALU's), a third word line, a
dual port output register, an output commutator, second sense
amplifier, gate circuits, and third and fourth amplifiers.
The Examiner continues by stating that whatever is disclosed
is "lacking sufficient description in the specification to
enable a determination of the equivalency of the implicit and
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007