THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MORIKUNI NAKAZATO, JIRO MAGARIFUCHI,
AKIHIRO MOCHIZUKI and HIROSHI TANABE
____________
Appeal No. 96-2888
Application No. 08/222,4951
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 3, 4 and 8 through 10 which are all of the claims
remaining in the application.
1
1 Application for patent filed April 4, 1994. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application No.
07/927,906 filed August 10, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007