Appeal No. 96-2888
Application No. 08/222,495
narrow in scope than claimed subject matter is not sufficient to
rebut a prima facie case of obviousness. In re Dill, 604 F.2d
1356, 1361, 202 USPQ 805, 808 (CCPA 1979).
For the above stated reasons, it is our ultimate
determination that the argument and evidence of record weighs
most heavily in favor of an obviousness conclusion. It follows
that we will sustain the examiner’s § 103 rejection before us on
this appeal.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007