Appeal No. 96-2953 Application 08/258,565 or suggest placing a condenser on the movable body, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 22, 24 and 25 for the same reasons discussed with regard to claim 16. We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9 and 26 through 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), nor the rejection of claims 7, 10 through 19, 22, 24 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) APPEALS AND LEE E. BARRETT ) INTERFERENCES Administrative Patent Judge) ) ) ) STUART N. HECKER ) Administrative Patent Judge) 20Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007