THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RAYFORD C. HUBBARD
__________
Appeal No. 96-2995
Application 08/383,6081
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 1 through 5, 8, 9 and 11;
Application for patent filed February 2, 1995. According to appellant, the1
application is a continuation of Application 08/136,805, filed October 14, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007