Ex parte HUBBARD - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-2995                                                           
          Application 08/383,608                                                       


          claims 6, 7, 10 and 16 , having been canceled; and 12 through2                                                      
          15 and 17 having been allowed.                                               
          The claimed invention relates to a system for providing                      
          audio or visual messages from a recorded medium to the                       
          passengers riding in a passenger conveyance vehicle such as a                
          bus.  To control the operation of the recorded message player,               
          a pressure- operated switch is mounted adjacent the arm of the               
          conveyance driver, and is operated in response to pressure                   
          between the driver's arm and his torso.  The pressure results                
          from a voluntary act of the driver as he realizes that he is                 
          approaching a vehicle stop or a point of interest and wishes                 
          to provide a message to the passengers.                                      
               Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                        
               1.  In a passenger conveyance vehicle, a system for                     
          sensory announcement of a series of discrete messages, each                  
          identifying an approaching stop or point of interest, the                    
          combination comprising:                                                      
               first means including a play-back device for transcribing               
          signals recorded therein;                                                    
               second means including at least one sensory indicator                   

               2Claim 16 was actually never entered into the record as the amendment after the
          final rejection, filed on October 10,1995 was denied entry as per advisory action mailed
          on November 29,1995. However, the parties have presented their positions on appeal as if
          claim 16 was in fact in the record. We also assume that to be the situation in our
          decision.                                                                    
                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007