Appeal No. 96-3085
Application 08/274,655
rejected these claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Peet in view of Bogaert. Bogaert relates to
a time accounting system for accounting for the time a process
spends in a ready state, a wait state, or a running state.
Bogaert does not cure the above noted deficiency of Peet.
Therefore, we reverse these obviousness rejections of claims
3/1 and 3/2.
In conclusion, we reverse the rejections of claims 1, 2,
4/1, 4/2 and 8 through 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Peet, and the rejections of claims 3/1 and
3/1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Peet in
view of Bogaert.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 4
and 8 through 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007