Appeal No. 96-3106
Application 08/052,015
Examiner and the arguments in support of the rejections. We
have, likewise, reviewed the Appellants' arguments set forth
in the brief.
We conclude that the rejection of claim 19 under
35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second paragraphs, is not
sustained, the rejections of claims 1, 2, 6 through 9, 18 and
19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Sutrina and Granberg are
sustained, and rejections of claims 3 through 5 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 over
Sutrina and Granberg are not sustained. Accordingly, we
affirm-in-part.
We first consider the rejection of claim 19 under 35
U.S.C. § 112, first and second paragraphs, and then the
rejections of claims 1 through 9, 18 and 19 under various
groupings under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Sutrina and Granberg.
Rejection of claim 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 112
The Examiner rejected claim 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph and second paragraph, first alleging that the
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007