Appeal No. 96-3274 Application 08/173,408 the adapter interface host address space 101 and the network interface logic does not have access to this address space. Perhaps the Examiner meant to refer to the registers in the adapter's memory 103 (e.g., col. 11, lines 6-10). Third, both the host interface logic 102 and the network interface logic 104 in figure 3 are part of the network interface processor 14 in figure 1; the functional units of the network interface processor are shown in figure 2. It appears as if the Examiner has divided the network interface processor 14, which seems to best correspond to a "network interface module," into both a "micro-engine" and a "network interface module." We would have liked to see some reasoning for this interpretation. Nevertheless, since Appellant argues only that Petersen does not disclose a network interface module that is timed asynchronously with respect to a micro-engine, and a point-to-point interface, we limit our analysis to those two differences. The Examiner admits that Petersen does not disclose asynchronous timing or a point-to-point interface (FR3). Regarding the asynchronous timing limitation, the - 6 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007