Appeal No. 96-3274
Application 08/173,408
In conclusion, the Examiner has failed to establish a
prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the "timed
asynchronously" limitation of claim 1. The rejection of
claim 1 and its dependent claims 2-4 is reversed. Independent
claims 5-7 and 15 also require asynchronous timing and, hence,
the rejection of claims 5-10 and 15 is likewise reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 10 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007