Appeal No. 96-3294
Application 08/055,422
skill in the art at the time of the invention would have known
to have preferred a higher read-to-write ratio because a more
frequently read file was a better candidate for more frequent
access" (EA6). As discussed in connection with claim 1, the
Examiner has not established the obviousness of implementing a
plurality of buffer management policies based on the
read/write ratio; therefore, modification of a policy based on
read/write ratios is not persuasive. The Examiner has failed
to establish a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to
claim 10. The rejection of claim 10 is reversed.
- 11 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007