Appeal No. 1996-3320 Page 4
Application No. 08/342,955
wherein Y is a direct bond, C -C alkylene, -S-, -O-, -SO-, -SO -l 6 2
or -CO-, and R is hydrogen or methyl, and wherein the aromatic
1
and cycloaliphatic rings of formulae (IIa)-(IIe) are
unsubstituted or substituted by one or more than one
substituent selected from the group consisting of C -C aIky
1 6
chloro and bromo,
(b) 15-70% by weight of one or more than one bifunctional
acrylate or methacrylate having a molecular weight in the range
from 150 to 450 and differing from the compound of formula(Ia)
or (Ib)
(c) 0-40% by weight of one or more than one monomeric
polyfunctional acrylate or methacrylate having a functionality
of not less than 3 and a molecular weight of not more than 600,
(d) 0-10% by weight of at least one monofunctional acrylate or
methacrylate,
(e) 0-10% by weight of N-vinylpyrrolidone or N-vinylcaprolactam,
(f) 2-10% by weight of at least one photoinitiator, and
(g) 0-60% by weight of at least one urethane acrylate or
methacrylate having a functionality of 2-4 and a molecular
weight in the range from 500-10000,
such that the sum of the amounts of components(a) to (g)
together is 100% by weight.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007