THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 12 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte STEVEN J. DIETL and MICHAEL CARLOTTA _____________ Appeal No. 96-3340 Application 08/363,0871 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before, HAIRSTON, CARMICHAEL and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 10- 13, 18 and 19 which are all of the claims pending in this application. 1Application for patent filed December 23, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of application 07/885,704, filed May 19, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,420,625, issued May 30, 1995. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007