THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STEVEN J. DIETL and MICHAEL CARLOTTA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3340
Application 08/363,0871
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before, HAIRSTON, CARMICHAEL and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 10-
13, 18 and 19 which are all of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed December 23, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of application 07/885,704, filed May 19, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,420,625, issued May 30,
1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007