Ex parte DIETL et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 96-3340                                                                                         
              Application 08/363,087                                                                                     


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                            

                     The present invention relates to a system for supplying liquid ink to the print head of             
              an ink-jet printing apparatus.  The system consists of a housing for an ink-jet printer                    
              cartridge.  Within the housing are three areas for ink storage.  A first area comprises a                  
              majority of the volume of the housing and is filled with a porous material having a capillary              
              force to hold the liquid ink.  A second area in the housing includes a "scavenger" member                  
              which has a smaller volume than the first area, but has a higher capillary force than the first            
              member.   A third area is an open space having no porous material therein.  The                            
              combination of the three areas provides the flow of liquid ink to the print head.  The                     
              "scavenger" member feeds the ink to the print head and draws ink from the other two                        
              areas.   As the ink is supplied to the print head and depleted from the housing a negative                 
              pressure is generated in the housing. The three areas are disclosed as having the liquid                   
              ink communicate therebetween to reduce the back pressure to an acceptable range for                        
              proper operation of the printer and to prevent leakage of the liquid ink.                                  
                                                                                              2                          
                     Appellants have indicated that all claims stand or fall together.  (Brief  at page 5.)              
                                    3                                                                                    
              Independent claim 1  is representative of the invention and reproduced as follows:                         


                     2 Appellants filed an appeal brief, January 22, 1996, (Paper No. 10).   We will refer to this       
              substitute appeal brief as simply the brief.                                                               
                     3 We have reviewed claim 1 (as amended) in light of the specification as originally filed and note  
              that we do not find explicit support in the specification or the originally filed claims for the relationship of the
              open space to the size of the scavenger member or clear support of the functional relationship of the      
                                                           2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007