Ex parte DULAC et al. - Page 1



                                                       Paper No. 27                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                               Ex parte KEITH C. DULAC                                
                            and WILLIAM V. COURTRIGHT, II                             
                                   ______________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1996-3365                                  
                              Application 08/258,3571                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   _______________                                    
          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and HECKER, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal from the final                       
          rejection of claims 1 and 3.  Claims 5 through 7 and 9 through              




               Application for patent filed June 9, 1994.  According to appellants,1                                                                     
          this application is a continuation of Application 07/701,921, filed May 17, 
          1991, now abandoned.                                                        

                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007