Appeal No. 1996-3365 Application 08/258,357 n.14 (Fed. Cir. 1992), citing In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984). "Obviousness may not be established using hindsight or in view of the teachings or suggestions of the inventor." Para-Ordnance Mfg. v. SGS Importers Int’l, 73 F.3d at 1087, 37 USPQ2d at 1239, citing W. L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d at 1551, 1553, 220 USPQ at 311, 312-13. Since there is no evidence in the record that the prior art taught or suggested the claimed structure, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claim 1 and likewise claim 3 which is dependent therefrom and contains the same limitations. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007