Ex parte DULAC et al. - Page 7



          Appeal No. 1996-3365                                                        
          Application 08/258,357                                                      



          n.14 (Fed. Cir.  1992), citing In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900,                  
          902,                                                                        
          221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  "Obviousness may not be              
          established using hindsight or in view of the teachings or                  
          suggestions of the inventor."  Para-Ordnance Mfg. v. SGS                    
          Importers Int’l, 73 F.3d at 1087, 37 USPQ2d at 1239, citing W.              
          L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d at 1551,                 
          1553, 220 USPQ at 311, 312-13.                                              
                   Since there is no evidence in the record that the                 
          prior art taught or suggested the claimed structure, we will                
          not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claim 1 and likewise                
          claim 3 which is dependent therefrom and contains the same                  
          limitations.                                                                















                                          7                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007