THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NAOSHI YAMADA, HITOSHI OHTA, HIROSHI FUKUMOTO, NAOYA
TANAKA, YUICHI YOSHIDA, and TAKUJI ODA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3386
Application No. 08/136,1231
____________
HEARD: October 6, 1999
____________
Before HAIRSTON, HECKER, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 4, 6 through 9, 18, and 19.
Claim 5 is canceled. Claims 10 through 17 are withdrawn from
consideration.
Application for patent filed October 14, 1993.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007