THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KIMIKO GOTOH
__________
Appeal No. 96-3440
Application 08/261,6131
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JERRY SMITH, CARMICHAEL, and RUGGIERO, Administrative
Patent Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 2
and 7-9. Claim 1 was canceled. The Examiner’s Answer
indicates that the other remaining claims, Claims 3-6 and 10,
are directed to allowable subject matter.
Claim 7 reads as follows:
A low-voltage output driving circuit comprising:
1 Application for patent filed June 17, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007