Appeal No. 96-3604 Page 4
Application No. 08/383,658
a second head core, integrally formed with said second
slider, to perform recording/reproducing of information
on/from said flexible magnetic disk.
Besides admitted prior art (Admission), the reference
relied on by the patent examiner in rejecting the claims
follows:
Gomi et al. (Gomi) 4,912,582 Mar. 27, 1990.
Claims 5 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
obvious over Admission in view of Gomi. Rather than repeat
the arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer
to the appeal brief and the examiner’s answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered
the subject matter on appeal and the rejection and evidence
advanced by the examiner. We also considered the appellants’
and examiner’s arguments. After considering the record before
us, it is our view that the evidence and the level of skill in
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007