Appeal No. 96-3612
Application 08/161,869
Claims 24 through 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Ogi in view of Fujioka, Nakanishi
and Crow.
Claims 13 and 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as3
being unpatentable over Fujioka in view of Ogi, Nakanishi and
Gleissner.
Claims 13 and 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Ogi in view of Fujioka, Nakanishi and
Gleissner.
Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Fujioka in view of Ogi, Nakanishi and
Wright.
Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Ogi in view of Fujioka, Nakanishi and
Wright.
Reference is made to the briefs and the answers for the
respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.
OPINION
3Claim 17 was not listed in the grounds of rejection (Answer, pages 3 through
13). Since this claim is directed to the same conductive resin material recited in
claim 13, we have listed claim 17 with claim 13.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007