Appeal No. 96-3612
Application 08/161,869
Based upon the foregoing, the obviousness rejections of
claims 12, 14, 16 and 18 based upon the teachings of Fujioka,
Ogi and Nakanishi are reversed.
The obviousness rejections of claims 24 through 26 are
reversed because the injection molding teachings of Crow do
not cure the noted shortcomings in the teachings of Fujioka,
Ogi and Nakanishi.
The obviousness rejections of claims 13 and 17 are
reversed because the carbon fiber reinforced polyamide
teachings of Gleissner do not cure the noted shortcomings in
the teachings of Fujioka, Ogi and Nakanishi.
The obviousness rejections of claim 27 are reversed
because the chip carrier teachings of Wright do not cure the
noted shortcomings in the teachings of Fujioka, Ogi and
Nakanishi.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 12 through
14, 16 through 18 and 24 through 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
reversed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007