Ex parte FRIEDMAN et al. - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 1996-3770                                                                                     Page 4                        
                 Application No. 08/412,834                                                                                                             

                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Sawyer et al. (Sawyer)                                2,289,593                                    Jul. 14,                            
                 1942                                                                                                                                   
                 Wikle                                                 4,179,314                                    Dec. 18,                            
                 1979                                                                                                                                   
                 Ikushima et al. (Ikushima)                            4,692,192                                    Sep. 08,                            
                 1987                                                                                                                                   
                 Minoura et al. (Minoura), Japan Kokai published patent                                                                                 
                 application No. 56-163248, December 15, 19812                                                                                          
                          Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, and 9  stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.3                                                                            
                 § 103 as being unpatentable over Ikushima or Sawyer.  Claims 1,                                                                        
                 2, 5, 6, 8, and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                                        
                 unpatentable over Ikushima or Sawyer in view of Minoura.                                                                               
                 Claims 3, 4, and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                                             
                 being unpatentable over Ikushima or Sawyer in view of Minoura                                                                          



                          2All subsequent references in this opinion to Minoura is                                                                      
                 a reference to the English language translation of the                                                                                 
                 Japanese laid-open application of record. The examiner in the                                                                          
                 answer and appellants in the brief also appear to rely on that                                                                         
                 English translation of the Japanese laid-open application.                                                                             
                          3The reference to claim 10 at pages 3 and 4 of the answer                                                                     
                 is an apparent oversight as evidenced by the examiner's                                                                                
                 acknowledgment of the cancellation of claim 10 (answer, pages                                                                          
                 1 and 2). The examiner approved entry of the amendment filed                                                                           
                 October 25, 1995 in an advisory action mailed November 09,                                                                             
                 1995. We note that the October 25, 1995 amendment has not as                                                                           
                 yet been physically entered.                                                                                                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007