THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID NEFF
____________
Appeal No. 96-3851
Application No. 08/341,8491
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 4 and 17 through 40, which are all of the
claims pending in this application.
Application for patent filed November 18, 1994. According to1
appellant, the application is a continuation of Application 07/954,785, filed
September 30, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007