Appeal No. 96-3851
Application No. 08/341,849
fall together. We agree that the claims fall into the
following two groups: (1) claims 4, 17 through 29, and 32
through 40 and (2) claims 30 through 31. We will treat claim
4 as representative of group 1 and claim 30 as representative
of group 2.
We have carefully considered the claims, the applied
prior art references, and the respective positions articulated
by the appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our
review, we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 4,
17 through 29, and 32 through 40 and affirm the obviousness
rejection of claims 30 and 31.
Claim 4 requires the capability "of printing both black
ink and color ink at a given pixel" and "encoding of color
selection
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007