Ex parte ZEIHER et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 24              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                      Ex parte E.H. KELLE ZEIHER, BRIAN F. POST                       
                       WILLIAM F. McCOY and TIMOTHY L. CHAFFIN                        
                                    _____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 96-3854                                   
                            Application No. 08/027,8721                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before and COHEN, STAAB and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges                                                                      
          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5 through 7, 9 through 11, 13              
          through 16 and 18 through 21, which are all of the claims                   


               1Application for patent filed March 8, 1993.                           
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007