Ex parte FANTINELLI - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1996-3880                                       Page 9           
          Application No. 08/305,441                                                  


          Muliterno.  Claim 1 is not restricted to a wooden pencil.                   
          Accordingly, the examiner should consider whether or not it                 
          would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at              
          the time the invention was made to have modified a mechanical               
          pencil in accordance with the teachings and suggestion of                   
          Muliterno to observe the decrease in lead and thereby effect                
          the claimed invention.                                                      































Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007