THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDWARD A. SCHROEDER
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3918
Application No. 08/232,3511
____________
HEARD: August 4, 1999
____________
Before MEISTER, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed April 22, 1994. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/086,082 filed July 6, 1993, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/950,674 filed
September 25, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,279,496 issued
January 18, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007