Appeal No. 1996-3918 Application No. 08/232,351 Cir. 1988): "Commercial success is relevant only if it flows from the merits of the claimed invention." Here, while the chart showing might possibly be considered to establish that the sales figures for the "NEW STYLE" were better than the "OLD STYLE" since 1994, there is nothing which establishes that the "NEW STYLE" was the invention disclosed and claimed in the instant application. Moreover, the sales depicted in the chart have not been placed in a meaningful context, e.g., total market share or profitability. In this regard, it should also be noted that “evidence related solely to the number of units sold provides a very weak showing of commercial success, if any.” In re Huang, 100 F.3d 135, 140, 40 USPQ2d 1685, 1687 (Fed. Cir. 1996). The declaration also states that "[b]ased on my marketing activities I can state that the sales success of the single support system has been because of the feature of the single support adjustable backboard system with the basketball rim goal attached directly to the support member." This statement, however, is simply conclusory in nature and unaccompanied by any 11Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007