Appeal No. 96-3978
Application No. 08/092,628
specifying a duration of the memory access on an access-by-
access basis so as to make a duration of the memory access
cycle compatible with the access speed of at least the
semiconductor memory devices of the selected memory unit.
The Examiner relies on the following references:
Morgan 4,980,850 Dec. 25,
1990
(Filed May 14, 1987)
Bowater et al. (Bowater) 5,301,278 Apr. 05,
1994
(Effectively filed Apr. 29,
1988)
Claims 21-26 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Bowater in view of Morgan. Rather
than reiterate the Arguments of Appellant and the Examiner,
reference is made to the Briefs and Answer for the respective2
details.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
2The Appeal Brief was filed September 14, 1995. In
response to the Examiner’s Answer dated June 7, 1996, a Reply
Brief was filed June 27, 1996 which was acknowledged and
entered by the Examiner without further comment on April 1,
1997.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007