Appeal No. 96-3978
Application No. 08/092,628
review of Morgan we agree with Appellant (Reply Brief, page 2)
that whether or not these parameters are "physical"
characteristics of a memory, as asserted by the Examiner, they
are static parameters which give no indication of access speed.
Since, for all of the reasons discussed above, we are of
the view that the prior art applied by the Examiner does not
support the rejection, we do not sustain the rejection of
independent claims 21 and 23. Therefore, we also do not
sustain the rejection of dependent claims 22 and 24-26.
In conclusion , we have not sustained the Examiner’s
rejection of any of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Accordingly, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 21-
26 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007