THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM G. HAWKINS and CATHIE J. BURKE
____________
Appeal No. 96-3998
Application No. 08/344,3971
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and RUGGIERO, Administrative
Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 16, 18, 20-24 and the rejection of claim 28 added in an
amendment after final rejection filed October 27, 1995 which
was entered by the Examiner. The above claims constitute all
1Application for patent filed November 23, 1994.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/971,873, filed November 5, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007