Appeal No. 96-4029 Application 08/386,604 Therefore, we find that Appellant's claims recite a process or an apparatus which creates a list of modified graphic orders which allows for processing nonoverlapping portions of the first window in one step without having to override any of the lower priority windows. Upon a closer review of Anthias, we find Anthias teaches the process of overriding the lower priority windows. In column 1, lines 48 through 62, Anthias teaches that the prior art creates a composite display refresh buffer so that the system can display multiple tasks. Anthias teaches that the prior art maintains each task as being independent of the other and each task occupies nonoverlapping space in the memory. In column 4, line 66, through column 5, line 20, Anthias teaches that their invention relates to the maintaining of a current screen save area, directly equivalent to the screen matrix of the prior art referred to in Figures 1 and 2. In column 7, lines 37 through 45, Anthias points out the problem of reconstructing 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007