Appeal No. 96-4029
Application 08/386,604
through 9, and thereby the claims are not anticipated by
Anthias. Therefore, we will not sustain the Examiner's
rejection under
35 U.S.C. § 102.
Claims 3 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Anthias in view of Holden.
We note that the Examiner relies on Anthias for the teaching
of a list of modified graphic orders. Upon our review of
Anthias and Holden, we find that the references fail to
suggest or teach the list of modified graphic orders as
claimed by the Appellant. Therefore, we will not sustain the
rejection of claims 3 through 6 under
35 U.S.C. § 103.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1
through 9. Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is reversed.
REVERSED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007