Appeal No. 96-4122
Application 08/077,419
a plurality of sensors providing first signals
representing movements of the vehicle relative to an
inertial reference system;
means for correcting said first signals
dependent on at least one correction value, said at
least one correction value being dependent on a
plurality of second signals which represent one of
relative movements between a said body and a said
plurality of wheels, longitudinal movements of a
said vehicle, and transverse movements of a said
vehicle; and
means for determining movements of a said
vehicle relative to a road surface-fixed reference
system dependent on said corrected first signals;
and
means for controlling said chassis, dependent on
said determined movements.
Opinion
We reverse the rejection of claims 1-6 and 11.
A reversal of any prior art rejection on appeal should
not be construed as an affirmative indication that the
appellant’s claims are patentable over prior art. We address
only the positions and rationale as set forth by the examiner
and on which the examiner’s rejection of the claims on appeal
is based.
Claim 11 requires a plurality of sensors providing first
signals representing movements of the vehicle relative to an
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007